![]() |
| A pot of quinoa and quinoa soup cooking over a fire at the top of a mountain overlooking the Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia. |
On the 29th of November NPR published an article regarding quinoa that contained what we believed to be many nonfactual and grossly misleading elements. Mike and I have therefore jointly penned an open letter to NPR which takes issue with the some of the points made within the piece. We have emailed the author of the NPR article, Alastair Bland, and published the letter here for everyone to read.
Hello Alastair,
I read your article regarding the
quinoa craze and felt I needed to write you a letter.
I am currently down in Bolivia working
on a documentary about quinoa production and take issue with a number
of points raised in your work.
"And it's not without challenges.
In Bolivia, second in production to Peru, great prosperity has come
to many farmers. But communities in the Bolivian Andes that formerly
lived on quinoa have become unable to afford it and are now relying
more on nutritionally inferior processed foods."
Firstly, Bolivia out produces Peru,
although historically it was the other way round.
Second, I haven't interviewed a single
farmer from the Altiplano region this week, or in my previous time in
Bolivia, that has admitted to having given up eating quinoa due to
the inability to afford his own grain. This is a myth and a
falsehood. Quinoa farmers in Bolivia grow it for commercial gain.
They set aside some grain, sometimes of lesser quality, or they sow a
separate batch for personal use. I know this because I have spoken
directly with many farmers on their land, in their quinoa fields…as
recently as two days ago.
As farmers become more well off, their
eating habits become diversified as they can afford to eat other
foods. They CHOOSE to eat pasta or rice because of its increased
availability and, to them, because of its novelty. In Bolivia, the
social stigma is that quinoa is still a poor person's food, not a
Whole Foods hot commodity. Though, efforts are being made to educate
them on quinoa's increasing popularity in the first world…something
that they themselves are also figuring out due to the unprecedented
deluge of cash flow coming their way. So as they gain more wealth,
they look to eat the foods of those who they perceive as having a
higher social standing. The situation is far more complex than simply
saying “they can't afford to eat their own grain”.
"Bolivian llama herders are also
abandoning their flocks, once the region's natural fertilizer source,
and, instead, planting quinoa. This seems already to be causing
declining soil productivity."
Perhaps there have been instances. I
can neither confirm nor deny, but not once has this been brought to
my attention as a significant issue while in country. Yet I can
safely say, having just driven 10 hours back to La Paz from Uyuni, I
saw plenty of llama herders. I can assure you the practice is alive
and well and has not been abandoned wholesale. Newer farmers are
beginning to understand the importance of buying llama excrement for
the enrichment of their soil. Equally, llama herders are also
beginning to understand that farmers will buy their animals
excrement. Therefore the farmer and the herder understand the need
for one and other and the roles each of them have to play as quinoa's
popularity continues.
"And property disputes are
reportedly on the rise as South American entrepreneurs — often
landless arrivals from the cities — compete with one another for
growing space in the limited arable land of the Andes as they try to
cash in on the quinoa craze."
It is true…there are property
disputes. Would you like to know how they are settled? Most of the
land in the Altiplano is owned directly by the members of the
community. They have leaders called Jilakatas, who are the
individuals who have lived and worked the land for the most time.
Basically “the elders”. In Bolivia, these Jilakata's and other
community members have the legal right to decide who to grant land
to. As the quinoa craze increases, many individuals are returning to
their communities of origin, after originally abandoning the
community during the rough times, in an attempt to claim what they
believe to be their land via birthright. Sometimes the leaders allow
them a slice of land, sometimes not, but they simply do not roll over
and give up when "landless arrivals from the cities" roll
into town.
I question your research. Have you been
to Bolivia? Have you spoken directly with Bolivian farmers? The
sources used in your story only link back to other NPR articles.
My team and I have liaised with the
Bolivian mission at the United Nations regarding the International
Year of the Quinoa, set for 2013. We have liaised with quinoa
farmers, laborers, market sellers and production plants. Who and
where are you sourcing your information? We would be happy to share
our sources with you. We would be happy to take this conversation off
line and discuss in private should you so wish.
The overwhelming evidence suggests that
as demand for quinoa increases, Bolivians growing quinoa is providing
a viable way of working themselves out of poverty. Perpetuating these
myths and half truths only serves to damage a growing economy and
undermine hard working farmers' efforts to lift themselves out of
poverty in an honest and sincere endeavor.
What are your motives behind this
article (and the others you reference)? It appears that you'd rather
Americans didn't buy from Bolivians and are making a concerted effort
to turn Americans away from eating Bolivian quinoa. Convincing
Americans that somehow boycotting Bolivian quinoa and taking away the
bulk of international demand will do the farmers more good is
unacceptable.
Is the American Dream restricted only
for Americans of the United States? Is it that ambition, hard work,
enterprise, blood, sweat and toil is only reserved for the people of
your choosing? Is it because seeing farmers in the Developing World
actually succeeding doesn't fit with your own expectation of misery
and starvation? Would you prefer the humble Bolivian quinoa farmer to stay poor and remain in his place?
I charge you that all these things are
the rights of all the peoples of the Americas across both continents, North and
South...if not the World.
Best Regards
Stefan Jeremiah and Michael Wilcox
![]() |
| A meal of quinoa and llama meat. The same meal eaten by everyone on the day we gave thanks to Pachamama. |
We also intend to post some exerts from our up coming documentary, The Mother Grain, of which we are in mid-production, of an interview with a Bolivian quinoa farmer explaining how her children demand to be fed quinoa.
For more comprehensive information about the documentary please visit: The Mother Grain


We were just as upset as you were by this NPR article. NPR usually researches their articles, and this is not one of those cases. Thank you for taking action and writing this letter.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI wish that were true, but over the last decade I have noticed a significant deterioration in the quality of NPR news' fact checking on topics with which I am well-familar (science and technology - I am a professional tech liaison).
DeleteThis notion that exporting quinoa to the United States is making it too costly and thus unavailable for Bolivians was floated in the media over a year ago. There was an AP article that appeared in January of 2011, followed by articles in the New York Times, The Independent, and others, all suggesting that people eating quinoa in the United States were hurting the people in Bolivia, and even "starving" them. The problem with these articles is that their facts are questionable, and their conclusions wrong. NPR unfortunately picked up their story from these earlier reports without checking the facts. Perpetuating such misinformation does a great disservice to both consumers of quinoa in our country, and to the hard working farmers in Bolivia looking to raise their country's rather meagre standard of living. Bravo to Stefan and Michael for taking the trouble of going to Bolivia and making it their mission to uncover and report on what is actually happening. They are the kind of journalists the world needs rather desperately.
ReplyDeleteSee: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/20/world/americas/20bolivia.html?_r=1&emc=eta1
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/features/the-food-fad-thats-starving-bolivia-2248932.html
Thank you for your comments and the article...to take it a step further, if people are eating more quinoa, they are buying less of another grain, such as corn. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if we found some large agro corn farmers or the like behind some of these anti-quinoa campaigns.
Deletethe corn grown for consumption is only a very small part of the profit from corn, most of it goes to make animal feed or corn syrup, not directly to the people. the 2 possible industries hurt by this would be wheat or rice, the two dominant grains that are grown for human consumption.
DeleteOne point: The original article doesn't say the farmers can't afford to eat quinoa, it says the people can't afford it, which strikes me as likely true, if it is being sold at a higher price to export markets.
DeleteThat was my first reaction too. It's an argument against something not claimed, & makes me question the entire article...
DeleteIt's especially bad to have such bad "reasoning" when complaining about someone ELSE getting facts wrong.
And that ending... People in AMERICA (North & South) definitely deserve a better life, & "maybe" the rest of the world. Nice.
I had little trouble interpreting the NPR article in question as bullcrap. Perhaps as the unreliability and bogus reporting methods of major news orgs becomes better known, we all will develop a better bullcrap meter of our own. Until then, thx for bearing witness to the "truth."
ReplyDeleteYES! Great article. We need to stop such ridiculous gossip with the real facts. False stories to satisfy the egos of journalists vying for any spotlight is misleading to consumers and destructive to a positive, productive livelihood for growing families - and an entire world that can benefit from such a tremendous food as quinoa.
ReplyDeleteI thought you were doing a fine job addressing the concerns in the NPR piece until you got to the end and started questioning the motives of the organization for publishing the story.
ReplyDeleteYou reasonably enough ask for the sources NPR used for their story. So I'll ask you the same - what is the source for your accusations that there is some nefarious reason behind it? Why do you accuse the authors of such extreme jingoism?
If you indeed have evidence to support your charges, then by all means let's see it. Otherwise, in my opinion, you ruined a fine defense of the quinoa industry.
And that's a pity.
Hear hear.
DeleteAgree completely.
DeleteI don't agree. Whether they are intentionally to misleading the public or just are doing a poor job of reporting there is reason for concern.The original articles have a strong tone of "buy domestic" and "vegetarians are hurting the global economy" that the quinoa story seems to only be the method for delivering their ideology. The reporter didn't just cook these facts up themselves, some mysterious "source" tipped them off with false information that they were all to willing to swallow. It isn't hard to imagine who benefits from stories like these, and who has the money and influence to spread them. Definitely smell big agro-business on the other end of this story.
DeleteWhy? The CIA and DEA are involved in destabilizing the Bolivian economy as Evo Morales is an outspoken critic. It is par for the course to plant damaging half-truths in nationally syndicated news stories. This is the history of the media in Latin America of the last sixty years.
DeleteI agree that the article goes rather off the rails at the end. There is simply no need for that degree of hostility or paranoia. But the letter, overall, presents its argument very well, and is an excellent counterpoint (aside from the fact that it needs an edit and proofread).
DeleteGlad the anonymous#1 spotted the point. I feel clear about I did not even realize what.
ReplyDeleteI just enjoyed all three of the points. The coin might have more than three sides.
I believe in the local foods 'trends' because I read some articles. However, now I learned, no silver bullet.
I can keep my mind open to all good reasons.
Thanks for checking the facts and posting an answer to NPR's article. We believe there are still many challenges farmers face, some of which are brought on by the growing demand for quinoa, and yes, their community is impacted and development will take time. But no one can deny the opportunity that the growing global demand in quinoa offers them. Many NGOs and Fair Trade farmer groups, which have a strong presence in the growing area, consider overcoming these challenges a priority, through investing in community projects, changing agricultural techniques and building direct relationships with the farmers.
ReplyDeleteRead more: http://www.alterecofoods.com/blog/edouards-response-to-attacks-on-quinoa”
Facts - what facts both seem to be opinion pieces. Facts would be level of consumption by the Bolivian population, rural vs cities over time; price of the grain as a proportion of average wages, rural vs cities over time; land ownership community vs individual over time; farm income over time by crop grown: etc.
DeleteWe collect statistics for a reason - because with out statistics both appear to be opinion pieces full of anecdotes but not facts.
Today, the UK Guardian published an article by Joanna Blythman that mirrors the NPR bias. I'll include a link below. I thankyou for your letter to NPR, which I have linked to numerous times today to provide another point of view!
ReplyDeleteOne question I keep hearing has to do with the urban poor. While the idea that the farming community is hurting for access to quinoa is unsubstantiated in your experience, is this equally true for those in cities? What I mean is, is the price of quinoa now so high there that urban dwellers in Bolivia who would have still considered it a staple until the boon, that they are no longer able to afford it?
Or is that claim also exaggerated given people's preference for a different diet today?
Here's the Gaurdian article, full of errors (about soy also, grown first and foremost as cattle feed), for what it's worth! Thanks again, Fireweed
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/16/vegans-stomach-unpalatable-truth-quinoa
That is precisely what I want to ask too. Until this concern is addressed. I'm still concerned that while the farmers benefit, the other poor that used to rely on quinoa as a subsistence grain cannot afford it.
DeleteThank you!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteQuestion... you mention that quinoa farmers either hold a percentage of their produce for personal consumption or have no problem purchasing because of the profits. I'm wondering about Bolivians who are not farming/producing/profiting from the production of quinoa. Are they not the people most effected by the rise in prices? Is this not also a conversation about trade practices as much as anything? Can there be any question that Capitalist practices are infecting and harming poor people in virtually every part of the world and that this is what needs to be addressed? This response does not delve deeply enough into these issues to satisfy my concern about this issues raised.
ReplyDeleteI agree, I am not satisfied with the answers here.
DeleteWe at Alter Eco wish to provide our firsthand experience as a fair trade company working with quinoa communities in Bolivia. First and foremost, we at Alter Eco are pleased that these discussions are shining light on the struggle of quinoa farmers in the Bolivian Altiplano, clearly one of the poorest areas in the world. We travel to Bolivia three times a year to visit producers and their organizations in order to conduct internal audits that verify that the price we pay is just and reflects our commitment to fair living wages for farmers; that the growing methods are organic; and that farmer organizations grow as sustainably as can be so that the success of quinoa worldwide directly improves their lives, and may continue to do so for subsequent generations.
DeleteIt is true that quinoa has today become quite expensive for local populations to purchase. It is however inaccurate to say that this has radically changed the way Bolivianos consume the grain. We agree with you that the difficulties and chanllenges are stemming from the system; Globalization in general has accelerated the taste for and consumption of western processed foods and diets by local populations in developing countries around the world. We encourage you to read more on how and why this is changing in Bolivia.
http://bit.ly/V98lym
It isn't the *farmers* who can't eat the quinoa, it's the people in the towns and cities who aren't farming and have traditionally bought it that can't afford to eat it. Instead they are having to buy cheaper rice and wheat which aren't nearly as nutritious - in an area where people already suffer from high levels of malnutrition. The american dream is a lie, an unsustainable lie and the short term (and it will be as they've moved to a monoculture for export) riches farmers are experiencing - as if 70 cents a lb is wealthy - it's distriibutors getting wealthy - will not bear out as they need to start buying more and more soil ammenders etc. I doubt these myopic documentary filmmakers have been to other developing countries to see what happens when a food goes from feeding the peple of a region to a commodity. I'd suggest they look at rural India for a better picture. Just wait the next indignity will be the stealing of their seed by Monsanto and trademarking and farmers needing to buy back their own seed every year. Search India farming revolution and collapse. Read up on Indian farmer suicides, or malnutrition in Kung foragers (previously foragers) in Africa, or the Philippines. Here this encapsulates a lot - http://monthlyreview.org/2012/01/01/food-as-a-commodity. The point being you've "discovered" quinoa, great, buy from a fair trade collective that has the farmers best interests at heart, grow it here, buy from canadian growers because making it a sought after global commodity is denying access to the local people who relied on it...and food security is too basic a right to let that happen...our western privilege our big pockets and our gluttony are taking food out of other people's mouths. I read anther article that also missed the point entirely and used lobster in place of quinoa - before the 60's lobster had no value so the poor ate it - Mo took lobster rolls to school for lunch all the time. Now the poor can't afford this great protein source but they can buy mac and cheese and other cheap processed foods instead - like that's great - yay choice! Yay nutritionally bereft choices! Yay globalization! Pull the protein from the poor and serve it up to the rich! The people can't afford grain? Let them eat cake!
DeleteI have the same question as the other person (who is also named Anonymous, just like me!!) What about people who aren't quinoa farmers? Has their ability to afford this food been affected?
ReplyDeleteI'm an agronomist who speaks Spanish with near-native fluency and enough Quechua to be polite. Over the years I've worked extensively with quinoa growers in Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador. If anything you understate your case against NPR. For most small farmers it is a wonderful opportunity to find cash markets for a product which grows well on your land, especially since quinoa isn't a source of starch so much as a protein supplement.
ReplyDeleteThe major Andean starches are potatoes, and in more remote areas a couple of unrelated tubers called oca and ulluco. At lower altitudes they eat more yuca, which is manioc, and (upland) rice. For protein they commonly eat mutton and guinea pig (which is delicious), along with faba beans, eggs, quinoa, some cheese and red beans. Pork, too, at lower elevations.
Many's the time I have greatly enjoyed a simple meal of mot"e'e (potatoes and faba beans with firey lachwa sauce) and caldo de cuy (guinea pig stew) thickened with potatoes and quinoa.
The real food starch problem is in Mexico and Central America where the diet is largely corn-based. The American political ethanol boondoggle has driven corm prices so high the locals can't afford it, so the do without. Not so in the Andes.
Awesome information Bart regarding getting some 3rd party perspective on this story, thank you for sharing! I agree with someone else above that the NPR article unfairly calls out vegans/vegetarians for being elitist health nuts. Why shouldn't we reduce our intake of meat products and choose to eat more of this wonderfully healthy grain? As if we don't import tons of products from around the world to the U.S.. The cost spiking has nothing to do with Peru or Bolivia but wall street economy speculators who's primary goal is to increase profit margins on commodities for trading. Do the Peruvians and Bolivians see that increased price in sales, no and that's the unfortunate part of the equation. I support local, fair trade, organic and sustainably grown companies and products as much as possible for this reason.
DeleteI look forward to seeing the documentary on the mother grain Stefan and Michael! Thank you! Come check out a great green social network my boyfriend and I are a part of called CrunchyHippie.com~
I lived and worked in Tacna this summer, an urban area with a huge influx of migrants (Aymaran) from the altiplano. There, the price increase of quinoa is definitely affecting the local diet and is having dramatic impacts on the health of the population. It's not as common as the traditional diet in the region around Tacna, but it is in the diet of the immigrants. Convenience foods have replaced quinoa as the prices have gone up, and the rates of overweight persons and persons with diabetes have skirocketed, so that it is one of primary causes of morbidity in Tacna. Ultimately this will be borne out through rising costs in the healthcare system, which will in turn affect the farmers. Yes, the Guardian UK article and the NPR article unfairly attacked vegans/vegetarians, but your article similarly focuses too narrowly on one part of the whole issue. My contacts in Peru worry that the quinoa price increase (look at the difference of the cost to the consumer, not the farmer) between 2008 and 2012) is one symptom of a massive health crisis in Peru.
DeleteThanks Bart, yours is the most authentic voice in this thread. I'll add that many or most NPR listeners have no idea that quinoa was introduced as a crop and then to the North American diet 25 years ago; other Andean crops are following the same pathway. For those wanting a better historical perspective on quinoa in North America than NPR's sensationalist newsbit, find a copy of the pioneer book, Quinoa, the Supergrain: Ancient Food for Today (Rebecca Wood, 1989).
ReplyDeleteI very much appreciate both the article shedding light on this picture, and questioning NPR's motives. Agribiz like ADM is a major funder of NPR.
ReplyDeleteSo is Monsanto.
Perhaps this is less about NPR 'not wanting to see the Bolivian farmer profit', and more about destroying both their food sources and their diet. Health-conscious Americans purchasing this quality protein probably does more to keep them growing these foods self-sufficiently than anything else we do.
I suspect that the exporting of quinoa to the US is not the major factor in the food choices of poor urban Bolivians. I'm betting our toxic, mass-produced GMO 'food products' are (or will be) sold more cheaply than the local products, whether we buy Bolivian quinoa or not.
'Control the food, and you control the people.' -- Henry Kissinger
So if Monsanto wants to use exported quinoa as a lever to sell more GMO grain to Bolivia, why would they get NPR to run a story asking Americans to eat less quinoa? It doesn't make sense. Also, in 2009 Bolivia exported 18 million pounds of Quinoa. That same year the US produced 728 BILLION pounds of corn. Quinoa isn't even a pebble in the road of American agriculture.
DeleteThese people cite NO sources and are perpetuating the myth that globalism is everybody's chance at the American Dream. That is EXACTLY what they said. Do not fall for this. These guys are shills for American corporatism, just like so many so-called aid societies. What they are actually doing is supporting the disruption of the local economy and making it dependent on a market far away, and a transportation system they have no control over. And now Bolivians get to eat the same crap as every diabetic and obese American, because it is a novelty.
ReplyDeleteIn what way is this good?
It's not. I am with you on this one.
DeleteThe American Dream isn't even any good for Americans, as far as I can tell. We're certainly not the happiest people on the planet. The average American seems to be living a ridiculously excessive lifestyle of consumption. It's not even good for *us*.
I would like to know who these people writing the article are working on behalf of.
ReplyDeleteI know that as a young adult living in the farm-belt, if you were to go to the large scale farmers who were given the seed to either plant in their fields OR told to not plant that season, that they are not allowed to say ANYTHING against the company giving them the seeds. Therefore, if there are companies giving these families money to grow food, it does not mean that it is healthy, profitable or what is best for the families.
I do not know that to be the case, I think it is just important to accept that everyone has their own reality.
Talk to all the farmers in the U.S. who in the last century (the 1980's) were undersold by KRAFT who purchased and backlogged grains and dairy for 5 years, undercut the farmers at the markets and who, when about to loose their farms, were told by the banks to sign with the larger companies to grow more food, take out bigger loans and are now is debt to the 'store' for the next 3 generations....also, that they are not allowed to speak out against the company for fear of being paid a visit by a legalized mafia.
There are two sides to everything.
I actually experienced (and was saddened by) farmers selling their millet and buying white rice in Senegal as it is seen as what wealthy people do. I preferred the millet couscous and know how nutritious it is compared to the white rice they preferred if able to afford it. They only eat millet if they have to and cannot afford rice from asia.
ReplyDeleteI lost my faith in NPR when I heard them airing support for GMO crops right before Prop 37 came to vote here in CA. The media sell-out has gotten rotten to the core.
ReplyDeletePerhaps Monsanto was behind this article to prop up sales of their own crops... Wouldn't surprise me one bit!
ReplyDeleteWow, from my point of view, this reply questioning the original article is really a huff of pseudo-scientist people (you are just documentary-makers), that base all their arguments in some personal observations without any kind of scientific method, and the worst thing is that your speech is absolutely demagogic and aggressive, attacking personally the researchers of the original article.
ReplyDeleteThey basically consider themselves absolutely rigorous and in possession of the ultimate truth just because they have been once visiting the area having their own conclusions, based on personal observation without any kind of strict method. I consider this attitude completely naive and subjectivist, with lack of vision to many other possible hidden factors affecting the issue, defending at all cost an idealized perception of what you saw in your visit to the area. You just demonstrate that you do not know anything about how a rigorous study must be undertaken in order to say some statements.
On the other hand, the researchers of the original article just put on the table that there night be some pros and cons in the situation, in a very reasonable way, taking into account many different sources and connecting them, and not just their personal impression about how the situation is.
Please do not accuse to people of something they clearly do not even state, with conspiroparanoias in your mind, and try to make a more constructive debate based on solid arguments and not just your personal opinions. And read a bit how the world works, maybe discovering that boosting the local economy of a developing area might not always arrive to a happy end for everybody, and can turn in a process of accumulation of a few, dispossession, violence, etc.
I have no relation with any of the authors, I am just very concern about people making statements without any background, and saying how the world should be.
I have a problem with this blog post..
ReplyDeleteThe NPR article states
"And it's not without challenges. In Bolivia, second in production to Peru, great prosperity has come to many farmers. But communities in the Bolivian Andes that formerly lived on quinoa have become unable to afford it and are now relying more on nutritionally inferior processed foods."
The OP Blogger states
"Second, I haven't interviewed a single farmer from the Altiplano region this week, or in my previous time in Bolivia, that has admitted to having given up eating quinoa due to the inability to afford his own grain. This is a myth and a falsehood. Quinoa farmers in Bolivia grow it for commercial gain."
Problem is, what about people who live in communities in the Bolivian Andes that formerly lived on quinoa, that are not quinoa farmers?
So article is talking about apples, but blogger states the article is wrong because of oranges
I'm sorry, you fail
What about the poor people without land who still rely on quinoa? This is just another example of the international community forgetting about the most vulnerable populations around the world. The farmers may be making money but how is this new export affecting the landless and their ability to feed themselves and their families?
ReplyDeleteWho would create the myths and why? Who is losing shares while quinoa farmers profit? Who would desire the perpetuation of our culture's dietary and medical practice? Who would want to slow the process of cultural healing? Who would want to concentrate wealth and dilute the health of the world? Even our grossly wealthy will suffer from diseases that our illness causes. Everyone will until we learn to put each other first. We may accept the gift of true wealth with the will to give it selflessly.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this article! Thank you for giving a voice to those being targeted! And thank you for doing real research behind your articles!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteStefan,
ReplyDeleteI'd like to interview you regarding your experiences in Bolivia particularly regarding quinoa farming. I'm conducting an ethnography about social and health implications for Bolivia following surged Demand for quinoa. If you have an opportunity to accommodate my request I would like very much for you to contact me.
- Chinelo
chinelo79@hotmail.com